One useful feature of `semPlot::semPaths()`

is using
setting the argument `layout`

to a layout matrix to specify
the location of each node in a structural equation model. This guide
briefly explains how to use `layout`

, and then introduces the
helper function `layout_matrix()`

of `semptools`

that can be used to construct a layout matrix. Last, it describes how
`factor_layout`

is used in `set_sem_layout()`

to
specify the layout of the latent factors only, and let
`set_sem_layout()`

decide the positions of their
indicators.

`layout`

Does in
`semPlot::semPaths`

.Suppose we have a path model with four variables, `x1`

,
`x2`

, `x3`

, and `x4`

. `x1`

and `x2`

affects `x3`

, and `x1`

and
`x3`

affects `x4`

. In psychology, this model is
usually presented this way:

If we fit the model by `lavaan::lavaan()`

and use
`semPlot::semPaths()`

to generate the plot without using
`layout`

, this is the resulting plot:

```
library(lavaan)
library(semPlot)
<-
mod_pa 'x1 ~~ x2
x3 ~ x1 + x2
x4 ~ x1 + x3
'
<- lavaan::sem(mod_pa, pa_example)
fit_pa <- semPaths(fit_pa, whatLabels = "est",
p_pa sizeMan = 10,
edge.label.cex = 1.15,
style = "ram",
nCharNodes = 0, nCharEdges = 0)
```

This layout is different from the convention used in psychology.

To use `layout`

, we first decide the grid to be used to
position the variable (nodes). For example, for the conceptual diagram,
we can try a 3 by 4 grid

The pair of numbers in each cell denote the location of the cell in a
3 by 4 matrix as indexed in an R matrix. An empty column was added
between `x3`

and `x4`

because we want to move
`x4`

further away to the right.

We then create a matrix of the same dimension as the grid, and
initialize the cells by `NA`

, which denoted a cell with
*nothing*.

```
<- matrix(NA, 3, 4)
m
m#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4]
#> [1,] NA NA NA NA
#> [2,] NA NA NA NA
#> [3,] NA NA NA NA
```

We then set the position of each variable (node, as called internally
in a plot by `semPlot::semPaths()`

) by setting the
corresponding cell to the name of this variable as appeared in the
`lavaan`

model.

```
1, 1] <- "x1"
m[3, 1] <- "x2"
m[2, 2] <- "x3"
m[2, 4] <- "x4"
m[
m#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4]
#> [1,] "x1" NA NA NA
#> [2,] NA "x3" NA "x4"
#> [3,] "x2" NA NA NA
```

We can then set `layout`

to this matrix to tell
`semPlot::semPaths()`

how to position the four variables:

```
<- semPaths(fit_pa, whatLabels = "est",
p_pa sizeMan = 10,
edge.label.cex = 1.15,
style = "ram",
nCharNodes = 0, nCharEdges = 0,
layout = m)
```

Alternatively, we can type the matrix as it would appear if printed,
and set `byrow = TRUE`

:

```
<- matrix(c("x1", NA, NA, NA,
m NA, "x3", NA, "x4",
"x2", NA, NA, NA), byrow = TRUE, 3, 4)
m#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4]
#> [1,] "x1" NA NA NA
#> [2,] NA "x3" NA "x4"
#> [3,] "x2" NA NA NA
```

We need to type more because we need to include `NA`

for
all the empty cells. However, this approach let us see immediately how
the variables will be positioned. We just place the variables in the
target cell, without knowing the coordinates. This is a WYSIWYG
(what-you-see-is-what-you-get) approach. This is the approach used in
the Quick Start Guides.

`layout_matrix()`

in `semptools`

The WYSIWYG approach in the previous section has one drawback: It is
not easy to change the position of the variables and the dimension of
the grid. In real research, trial-and-error is usually needed to find a
desirable layout. For example, if we want to add a column or row, we
need ty type several `NA`

s to crate it.

The `layout_matrix()`

function in `semptools`

is designed to generate the matrix using the coordinates of the
variables. Instead of specifying the dimension ourselves,
`layout_matrix()`

will try to figure out the dimension based
on the coordinates automatically.

For example, to generate the same layout above, we can do this:

```
<- layout_matrix(x1 = c(1, 1),
m2 x2 = c(3, 1),
x3 = c(2, 2),
x4 = c(2, 4))
m2#> [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4]
#> [1,] "x1" NA NA NA
#> [2,] NA "x3" NA "x4"
#> [3,] "x2" NA NA NA
<- semPaths(fit_pa, whatLabels = "est",
p_pa sizeMan = 10,
edge.label.cex = 1.15,
style = "ram",
nCharNodes = 0, nCharEdges = 0,
layout = m2)
```

Suppose we want to move `x4`

closer to `x3`

.
Instead of deleting the 3rd columns of `NA`

, we can just
change the coordinates of `x4`

in
`layout_matrix()`

:

```
<- layout_matrix(x1 = c(1, 1),
m3 x2 = c(3, 1),
x3 = c(2, 2),
x4 = c(2, 3))
m3#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] "x1" NA NA
#> [2,] NA "x3" "x4"
#> [3,] "x2" NA NA
<- semPaths(fit_pa, whatLabels = "est",
p_pa sizeMan = 10,
edge.label.cex = 1.15,
style = "ram",
nCharNodes = 0, nCharEdges = 0,
layout = m3)
```

The best approach to specify the layout depends on the situation at
hand. During the trial-and-error phrase, using
`layout_matrix()`

is good for changing the layout. When the
layout has been finalized, for readability, typing the matrix row-by-row
may be better (although we can still use `layout_matrix()`

to
form the matrix and then print the matrix, as we did above).

`factor_layout`

in `set_sem_layout()`

If we use `layout`

in `semPlot::semPaths()`

for
a structural models with latent factors and we want to draw both the
factors and their indicators, we need to specify the positions of
*all* nodes, that is, all the indicators and all the factors. The
grid will be very large and it is difficult to determine the positions
of the indicators.

The `factor_layout`

argument in
`set_sem_layout()`

is developed to solve this problem. It
works like `layout`

in `semPlot::semPaths()`

. In
`set_sem_layout()`

, we only need to specify the positions of
the latent factors. As in `layout`

, we create a matrix to
specify the positions of the factors. The procedure is identical to what
illustrated above for a path model, and all the approaches presented
above can be used. The only difference is, only the names of the
*latent* *factors* need to be present in the matrix, and
the size of the grid only need to consider the factors.

For example, suppose we have 14 indicators and four factors, and this is the model:

```
<-
mod 'f1 =~ x01 + x02 + x03
f2 =~ x04 + x05 + x06 + x07
f3 =~ x08 + x09 + x10
f4 =~ x11 + x12 + x13 + x14
f3 ~ f1 + f2
f4 ~ f1 + f3
'
```

If we want to draw both the factors and the indicators, the plot will have 18 nodes:

```
<- lavaan::sem(mod, cfa_example)
fit <- semPaths(fit, whatLabels="est",
p sizeMan = 5,
node.width = 1,
edge.label.cex = .75,
style = "ram",
mar = c(5, 5, 5, 5))
```

Suppose we want to position the factors this way:

Again, we decide the grid to use, which is 3 by 3 in this example:

Therefore, this is the matrix to be used:

```
<- layout_matrix(f1 = c(1, 1),
m_sem f2 = c(3, 1),
f3 = c(2, 2),
f4 = c(2, 3))
m_sem#> [,1] [,2] [,3]
#> [1,] "f1" NA NA
#> [2,] NA "f3" "f4"
#> [3,] "f2" NA NA
```

Note that `layout_matrix()`

can also be used to set up the
orientation of the indicators of each factor:

```
<- layout_matrix(left = c(1, 1),
point_to left = c(3, 1),
down = c(2, 2),
up = c(2, 3))
```

We can then use this matrix in `set_sem_layout()`

(please
refer to `vignette("quick_start_sem")`

or
`?set_sem_layout`

on how to specify other arguments):

```
<- c("x04", "x05", "x06", "x07",
indicator_order "x01", "x02", "x03",
"x11", "x12", "x13", "x14",
"x08", "x09", "x10")
<- c( "f2", "f2", "f2", "f2",
indicator_factor "f1", "f1", "f1",
"f4", "f4", "f4", "f4",
"f3", "f3", "f3")
<- c(f3 = 2.5,
indicator_push f4 = 2.5,
f1 = 1.5,
f2 = 1.5)
<- c(f1 = 2,
indicator_spread f2 = 2,
f3 = 2,
f4 = 1.75)
<- c(f2 = .6,
loading_position f3 = .8,
f4 = .8)
<- set_sem_layout(p,
p2 indicator_order = indicator_order,
indicator_factor = indicator_factor,
factor_layout = m_sem,
factor_point_to = point_to,
indicator_push = indicator_push,
indicator_spread = indicator_spread,
loading_position = loading_position)
plot(p2)
```

This make it much easier to specify the positions of factors in a structural equation model with latent factors.